KTP/
github ↗
created 24 August 2026 · last modified 6 September 2026
advocacy / structured submission queue

Contribute.

Submissions are routed through structured channels. No comments section by design. The structure is the substrate.

You can contribute through the six routes below. Include sources and the change you propose so the submission can be reviewed. Review depends on scope, evidence, and available capacity; no response deadline is currently committed.

§01Submission types
Adoption submission

A bill, resolution, ordinance, or district policy that maps to one or more interventions. Include jurisdiction, document number, status, date, and an authoritative source. If claiming a KTP contribution, document who contributed and what they did. Prior policy and KTP-associated activity are recorded separately.

Review focus: Source verification and attribution. Current scoreboard snapshot: 2026-05-07. No update schedule is currently committed.
Correction

Factual error, misattribution, broken citation, or substantively misleading framing. Submit with the page URL, the specific text, the corrected text, and the primary-source basis for the correction.

Review focus: Primary-source support and the effect of the proposed correction.
Coalition partner addition

An organization or named individual with public position on substrate questions. Submit with public-position evidence, track record, and contact for verification. Tier (Aligned / Aligned-on-this-campaign / Watchlist) determined after review.

Review focus: Public-position evidence, verification, and an appropriate tier.
Phase 2-4 intervention proposal

A new intervention proposal in K-12 or in an adjacent domain (healthcare, broadband, election infrastructure, etc.). Submit with the public-card 5-field draft and the deep-page narrative skeleton. Include the evidence needed to assess feasibility and likely effects.

Review focus: Feasibility, evidence, scope, and possible revisions.
Template addition

A new template for the 15-template library, or a variant of an existing template tuned to a specific jurisdiction or context. Submit with length cap, audience, structure outline, and named failure mode.

Review focus: Usability, jurisdictional fit, and the named failure mode.
Amendment submission

A proposed revision to an intervention or domain. Identify the gap, affected readers, supporting evidence, and the text you would change. The disclosure page describes the proposed amendment process and records published decisions.

Review focus: The documented gap and the evidence for a substantive revision.
§02Submission route

Submission goes through email with a structured subject line. The structured subject is the primary triage signal:

To: chrisperkins (at) kinetic-trust-protocol.net
Subject: [ADVOCACY] [TYPE] [SHORT-DESCRIPTION]

Where TYPE is one of:
  ADOPTION       — bill, resolution, ordinance, district policy adopted
  CORRECTION     — factual or framing correction to an existing page
  PARTNER        — coalition partner addition
  PROPOSAL       — Phase 2-4 intervention proposal
  TEMPLATE       — new template or variant
  AMENDMENT      — identifies a gap and proposes a substantive revision

Include the required fields listed above, a primary source where possible, and the change you propose. This gives a reviewer enough context to assess the submission.

§03What you should expect

The contribution route is available, but a submission does not guarantee a response, publication, or a date for review. The scoreboard remains a snapshot dated 2026-05-07; a new submission does not by itself update its evidence.

Tell us how you would like to be credited if your contribution is incorporated, or ask to remain unnamed. You can also include a contact address for questions about the evidence.

How to cite
APA 7th ed.

Perkins, C. (2026, May 6). Advocacy Contribution Queue. Kinetic Trust Protocol. https://kinetic-trust-protocol.net/advocacy/contribute
reference
pending — source not yet published
RFC tree on GitHub ↗