KTP/
github
Skip to this page's sections
A staff member talks on a telephone beside a cream robot holding a blue document tray
Governed Autonomy · run it · writing rules

The rules this chapter is written to.

The eight rules, the fast and slow layers, the reasons behind the rules, and the acronyms the chapter uses.

The KTP mechanism

A spec that cannot be read the same way twice cannot be enforced the same way twice.

The RFC series is written to a controlled vocabulary for the same reason the workbook is: an envelope, a veto or a ceiling has to mean one thing to every reader and every machine. These are the rules the contract tabs are linted against, and the reasons each rule exists, so a reader can hold the chapter to them.
The working form, from the workbook
Three tab jobs. Eight rules with what each means and how it is enforced. Two layers, slow (why, at human speed) and fast (rules, at machine speed). The why behind each rule, with its status. The acronyms that recur across the chapter.

Acequia, Inc. is an invented organization. These pages present a working design, not deployment results; its contracted stages and change freezes are illustrative. The sections below mirror the Governed Autonomy workbook (v0.50): its columns, rules, invariants and catalogs, as written, with the worked example's organization named as it is there. The deployment's own rows, parties, contract identifiers and configuration stay with the deployment; where a table's rows stay, its columns are shown.

01Tab jobsworkbook tab 35 · Writing rules

What this is for. How the contract tabs are written so a test can fail them.

Advice cannot fail a test. A duty can. Each rule carries the reason it exists. How to use it. Read the why first. Then write only words a test can fail.

Adapted from the principles of ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English (STE); this is not a compliance claim. Acequia keeps its own dictionary. Exec Overview and Vision argue at human speed. The contract tabs state rules a test can fail. The full guide is ontology/WRITING.md.

1. Tab jobs

  • Why (human speed)
    Argument. Lineage, threat, destination.
    Tabs
    Exec Overview, Vision
    What applies
    Destop only. No sentence cap.
  • Rules (machine speed)
    Contract. What a person or machine must do or must not do.
    Tabs
    Claims & boundaries; Process spine; Review (decisions, exits, ); Physical & public safety; Media signal overlay rules; context rules; break-glass
    What applies
    Full rules. Lint on terms, length, slop. Modals are review-only.
  • Reference
    Data, IDs, sources.
    Tabs
    Registries, lookups, Detection *, ITIL, Relationship map, Party register, Sources, Related documents, Acronyms, Index, Document control, Writing rules
    What applies
    Dictionary terms only. No sentence-length checks.

022. The eight rulesworkbook tab 35 · Writing rules

What each rule means and how it is enforced.
  • 1
    One term, one meaning
    What it means
    CONTEXT.md is the dictionary. An Avoid entry is a banned synonym (Ticket for Case; bare TOC).
    Enforcement
    Lint
  • 2
    Automation, autonomy, agency do not swap
    What it means
    Automation is a machine running a step. Autonomy is permission inside a declared class. Agency is that permission once earned at V3.
    Enforcement
    Lint (approved terms)
  • 3
    Modals
    What it means
    must / shall = duty. must not = ban. should / ought = advice (not a test). may = permission without obligation. can / cannot = ability. might / could = hedge. Machine-speed rules use must, must not, can, cannot. Keep may when it means permission. Do not use should, ought, might, could, or may not.
    Enforcement
    Review only
  • 4
    Sentence length
    What it means
    Procedure (spine steps, falsifier tests, break-glass) is capped at 20 words. Descriptive machine-speed rules are capped at 25. Trim. Do not split an OR or AND test.
    Enforcement
    Lint
  • 5
    One instruction per sentence
    What it means
    Procedure rows carry one instruction per sentence.
    Enforcement
    Review only
  • 6
    Active voice, named actor
    What it means
    Operating Provider accepts, not is accepted.
    Enforcement
    Review only
  • 7
    No empty verbs or adjectives
    What it means
    No leverage, utilize, robust, seamless, and the rest of the destop list. drive as disk and support as a named function stay.
    Enforcement
    Lint
  • 8
    Approved project terms stay
    What it means
    autonomy, , join, bounded_execute, tempo, induced conservatism, , ARQ, . Each must exist in CONTEXT or Acronyms.
    Enforcement
    Lint

033. Fast and slowworkbook tab 35 · Writing rules

  • Slow — why
    Human tempo. Why. Ought until acceptance.
    What we keep
    Makes the fast layer safe. Cannot be sped to machine tempo (ASM-19).
    Use
    Keep
  • Fast — rules
    Machine tempo. Do / do not. Must / may plus a FAL.
    What we keep
    Runs only after the why turns it. Cannot write its own must.
    Use
    Keep

044. The why turns the doworkbook tab 35 · Writing rules

  • Exponential tools
    ASM-19 / FAL-19
    Status · Bound
  • Human in every loop (failed path)
    ASM-19 / ASM-28
    Status · Bound
  • Automate everything (failed path)
    ASM-12; not an automation-% target
    Status · Bound
  • Governed Autonomy
    ASM-02 / ASM-10; bounded_execute
    Status · Bound
  • Rule of three
    ASM-02 / ASM-10
    Status · Bound
  • Bounded / human-gated
    ASM-05 / ASM-12 / ASM-14 / ASM-28
    Status · Bound
  • Human-gated
    ASM-28 / FAL-28
    Status · Bound
  • Evidence-first
    ASM-06 / ASM-07
    Status · Bound
  • One spine
    ASM-09
    Status · Bound
  • Six-party join
    ASM-06
    Status · Bound
  • Named work / Operating Provider source of record
    ASM-03
    Status · Bound
  • Network Platform Provider provides / Operating Provider operates
    ASM-02
    Status · Bound
  • Agency is earned, not shipped
    ASM-10; not an autonomy grant
    Status · Bound
  • Compound payoff — cyber / civil / cognition
    ASM-16 / ASM-17 / ASM-18 / ASM-23 / ASM-26
    Status · Partial
  • Context can only take authority away
    ASM-27 / FAL-27
    Status · Bound
  • Emergency does not widen machines
    ASM-15 / ASM-24; BG-054 / BG-030 / BG-034
    Status · Bound
  • Freeze clock / V4 is a later payoff
    ASM-21 / FAL-21
    Status · Bound

05Acronyms the chapter usesworkbook tab 34 · Acronyms

The acronyms that are generic to the chapter; the deployment's own stay with it.
38 of 38
  • ADJ
    Adjudicated — Acequia evidence class: exists because a named authority recorded it.
    Not KTP-CLASS:A (Agentic).
  • APO
    Application Operations — Semantic Join seat.
    Not a Party register row.
  • ARQ
    Availability, Retainability, Quality — independent verification of service consequence
  • ASM
    Assumption identifier on Claims & boundaries; each carries a falsifier (FAL).
  • CAD
    Computer-aided dispatch — public-safety system; observe-only on the join
  • CMP
    Compliance — Semantic Join seat.
    Not a Party register row.
  • COP
    Competition Operations / competition venue class used in a playbook
  • CSIRT
    Computer Security Incident Response Team
  • CYB
    Cyber Security — Semantic Join seat.
    Not a Party register row.
  • DER
    Derived state — Acequia evidence class: read from a calendar, config, or table with as-of + validity.
    Not KTP-CLASS:S (Subjective).
  • DIR
    Direct — Acequia evidence class: one instrument samples a quantity.
    Not KTP-CLASS:D (Determined).
  • EDR
    Endpoint detection and response
  • ENU
    Enumerated — Acequia evidence class: computed over a counted set inside a boundary.
    Not KTP-CLASS:N (Narrative).
  • FAL
    Falsifier identifier on Claims & boundaries: the observable test that fails a claim.
  • GOV
    Governance — Semantic Join seat.
    Not a Party register row.
  • GRC
    Governance, Regulatory, and Compliance — three distinct join parties on the shared case
  • ITIL
    Information Technology Infrastructure Library — ITIL 4 practice taxonomy as shared service-management vocabulary; not joint version or certification evidence
  • ITO
    IT Operations — Semantic Join seat.
    Not a Party register row.
  • ITSM
    IT service management / ticketing system of record for security incidents
  • KAG
    Kinetic Action Gateway — a KTP implementation that binds one signed decision to one exact operation and holds it to that decision at release.
  • KG
    Knowledge graph — invariant prefix KG-1 to KG-26 for the join graph specified on the Knowledge graph tab.
  • KIL
    Kinetic Infrastructure Layer — a KTP implementation at the infrastructure boundary: signed-state verification and per-action authorization between authoritative refreshes.
  • KPI
    Key performance indicator — a measured service metric. Evidence, never a verdict.
  • KTP
    Kinetic Trust Protocol — the governance protocol whose Zeroth Law, , this workbook adopts in its testable form (ASM-27).
  • MCP
    Model Context Protocol — SIEM platform on MCP is context only
  • NCOP
    Non-competition operations / non-competition venue class
  • NOC
    Network Operations Center — IT Operations operating center
  • PACS
    Physical access control system — DIR/ENU evidence, not a safety declaration
  • PQC
    Production Quality Control (Media Provider).
    Not ARQ.
  • PUB
    Published — Acequia evidence class: a third party's number, read.
    Not KTP-CLASS:P (Policy).
  • REG
    Regulatory — Semantic Join seat.
    Not a Party register row.
  • RTOC
    Regional Technical Operations Center
  • SIEM
    Security information and event management
  • SLA
    Service level agreement — a contracted service target.
  • SLO
    Service level objective — the declared target a workload class must meet.
  • SOC
    Security Operations Center
  • STE
    Simplified Technical English — ASD-STE100 principles this workbook adapts.
    Not a compliance claim.
  • TOC
    Do not use bare TOC. Use TechnologyTOC (Acequia venue technical authority) or BroadcastTOC (Media Provider venue signal hub).
    Not the MOC.

Continue · Run it

How to cite
APA 7th ed.

Perkins, C. (2026). The rules this chapter is written to. Kinetic Trust Protocol. https://kinetic-trust-protocol.net/governed-autonomy/writing-rules
Plain text

Chris Perkins, "The rules this chapter is written to," Kinetic Trust Protocol, https://kinetic-trust-protocol.net/governed-autonomy/writing-rules.
Page created 28 October 2026 · last modified 2026-10-27